From: Internet.Postmaster@ccmail.Jpl.Nasa.Gov
Date: 23 Aug 94 06:25:00 -0800
Subject: [www-mling,00041] *** Internet Undeliverable Mail ***
Message-Id: <940823062807.CC2992560@CCMail.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
Your message has been rejected by the Internet gateway
because of the following reason(s):
Unknown cc:Mail user: www-mling
Please check for any misspellings you might have.
Most undeliverable mail are caused by misspellings.
Please remember that:
*********************************************************
* Internet addresses for JPL electronic mail users are: *
* Firstname.Mi.Lastname@Jpl.Nasa.Gov *
* or Firstname.Lastname@Jpl.Nasa.Gov *
*********************************************************
This is your original message and a trace of the gateway execution.
Please mail to postmaster@ccmail.jpl.nasa.gov if you have questions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Start of undeliverable message ***
Date: 23-Aug-94 22:19:41
Subject: [www-mling,00040] unsubscribe
From: www-mling@square.ntt.jp at Internet
Bcc: william y chen AT JPLPOST
Cc: www-mling AT JPLPOST
*** Unknown message recipient ***
Contents:
Message From: <ppc2@cs.wustl.edu> at Internet
hi,
can someone please tell me how to unsubscribe to this mailing list?
thanks.
peter
From: Peter P Chiu <ppc2@cs.wustl.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 1994 08:18:49 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [www-mling,00040] unsubscribe
Message-Id: <Pine.3.07.9408230848.B20603-7100000@wucs1.wustl.edu>
hi,
can someone please tell me how to unsubscribe to this mailing list?
thanks.
peter
From: leesj@cs.sejong.ac.kr (Lee Sang Jin)
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 1994 15:31:51 +0900 (KST)
Subject: [www-mling,00039] Re: how to specify xterm in Mosaic-l10n?
Message-Id: <9408230631.AA05338@cs.sejong.ac.kr>
Nelson CHIN writes:
>
> is there a way in the Xresources to specify a different xterm like
> cxterm in a telnet session on Mosaic-l10n?
Xresource
Mosaic.xtermCommand: "cxterm"
OR
~/Mosaic-2.4/src/xresource.h
======
...
#ifdef _AIX
"aixterm -v",
#else /* not _AIX */
"cxterm",
#endif /* not _AIX */
...
======
then recompile...
>
> Nelson
>
--
______________________________________________________
/\ \
\_| E-mail : leesj@cs.sejong.ac.kr (134.75.87.2) |
| Name : Lee Sang Jin |
| Phone : (02)460-0344 ZIP : 133-747 |
| Address : Computer Science, Sejong University |
| 98 Kunja, Seongdong Seoul, Korea |
| __________________________________________________|_
\_/___________________________________________________/
From: Nelson CHIN <cyl@ifcss.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 1994 00:56:40 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [www-mling,00038] how to specify xterm in Mosaic-l10n?
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9408230031.A2442-0100000@ifcss.org>
is there a way in the Xresources to specify a different xterm like
cxterm in a telnet session on Mosaic-l10n?
Nelson
From: Peter P Chiu <ppc2@cs.wustl.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 1994 19:35:45 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [www-mling,00037] unsubscribe
Message-Id: <Pine.3.07.9408221943.A15762-7100000@wucs1.wustl.edu>
hi,
can someone please tell me how i can unsubscribe to this mailing list?
thanks a lot
peter
From: norman@giardia.PDB.CDC.GOV (Norman J. Pieniazek x4073)
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 1994 15:53:57 +0500
Subject: [www-mling,00036] patch errors with l10n
Message-Id: <9408221953.AA06992@giardia>
----- Begin Included Message -----
Return-Path: norman Mon Aug 22 09:50:35 1994
To: takada@seraph.ntt.jp
Cc: takada@palomine.stanford.edu
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Content-Length: 19977
Hi:
I wrote to you last week and got no answer. Please do now, as
the question is more specific.
I have a Sun SPARC 10 with Solaris 2.3, gcc-2.6.0 and S.I.Works
Motif 1.2.3. Plain Mosaic-2.4 compiles just fine on my machine,
thanks for the help I got from many fine netters.
However, when applying you patch to freshly untarred Mosaic-2.4,
patch (I use patch-2.1) give a long list of problems. Please tell
me, if something is wrong or if that's normal and I should just
disregard it and compile Mosaic-2.4 with partially successful
patch.
Your kind reply would be greatly appreciated.
Norman
==========================================================================
Norman J. Pieniazek voice: (404) 488-4073
Centers for Disease Control fax: (404) 488-4108
Mailstop F13 e-mail: norman@giardia.pdb.cdc.gov
4770 Buford Highway NE
Atlanta, GA 30341-3724
####### The preceding message is not #######
####### an official document of the CDC. #######
===========================================================================
giardia# patch -p < ./Mosaic-2.4-l10n-0.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libXmx/Xmx.h.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:36 1994
|+++ libXmx/Xmx.h Wed Apr 13 05:19:55 1994
--------------------------
File to patch: cp Mosaic-2.4-l10n-0.patch Mosaic-2.4
No file found--skip this patch? [n] qgiardia#
giardia# cp Mosaic-2.4-l* Mosaic-2.4
giardia# cd Mosaic-2.4
giardia# patch -p <./Mosaic-2.4-l10n-0.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libXmx/Xmx.h.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:36 1994
|+++ libXmx/Xmx.h Wed Apr 13 05:19:55 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libXmx/Xmx.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 87.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libdtm/arch.h.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:37 1994
|+++ libdtm/arch.h Wed Apr 13 05:19:55 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libdtm/arch.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 235.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to libdtm/arch.h.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libdtm/dtmint.h.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:40 1994
|+++ libdtm/dtmint.h Wed Apr 13 05:19:56 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libdtm/dtmint.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 208 with fuzz 1.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libdtm/makefile.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:40 1994
|+++ libdtm/makefile Wed Apr 13 05:19:56 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libdtm/makefile using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 38 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #2 failed at 93.
1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to libdtm/makefile.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libhtmlw/HTML-PSformat.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:44 1994
|+++ libhtmlw/HTML-PSformat.c Wed Apr 13 05:19:56 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libhtmlw/HTML-PSformat.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 47.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 119 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 141.
Hunk #4 failed at 296.
Hunk #5 failed at 386.
Hunk #6 failed at 455.
Hunk #7 failed at 601.
Hunk #8 failed at 650.
Hunk #9 failed at 694.
Hunk #10 failed at 710.
Hunk #11 failed at 737.
Hunk #12 failed at 754.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 1396 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 1586 with fuzz 1.
9 out of 14 hunks failed--saving rejects to libhtmlw/HTML-PSformat.c.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libhtmlw/HTML.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:41 1994
|+++ libhtmlw/HTML.c Wed Apr 13 05:19:57 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libhtmlw/HTML.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 111 with fuzz 1.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 546 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 failed at 832.
Hunk #4 failed at 1942.
Hunk #5 failed at 1956.
Hunk #6 failed at 2496.
Hunk #7 failed at 2636.
Hunk #8 failed at 2728.
Hunk #9 failed at 2739.
Hunk #10 failed at 3454.
Hunk #11 failed at 4096.
Hunk #12 failed at 4164.
Hunk #13 failed at 4185.
Hunk #14 failed at 4215.
Hunk #15 failed at 4253.
Hunk #16 failed at 4396.
Hunk #17 failed at 4428.
Hunk #18 failed at 5799.
16 out of 18 hunks failed--saving rejects to libhtmlw/HTML.c.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libhtmlw/HTML.h.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:42 1994
|+++ libhtmlw/HTML.h Wed Apr 13 05:19:58 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libhtmlw/HTML.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 227.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 379 with fuzz 1.
Hunk #3 failed at 448.
Hunk #4 failed at 521.
3 out of 4 hunks failed--saving rejects to libhtmlw/HTML.h.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libhtmlw/HTMLP.h.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:45 1994
|+++ libhtmlw/HTMLP.h Wed Apr 13 05:19:58 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libhtmlw/HTMLP.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 59.
Hunk #2 failed at 168.
Hunk #3 failed at 221.
2 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to libhtmlw/HTMLP.h.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libhtmlw/HTMLformat.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:43 1994
|+++ libhtmlw/HTMLformat.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:00 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libhtmlw/HTMLformat.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 139.
Hunk #2 failed at 192.
Hunk #3 failed at 240.
Hunk #4 failed at 724.
Hunk #5 failed at 746.
Hunk #6 failed at 770.
Hunk #7 failed at 805.
Hunk #8 failed at 1383.
Hunk #9 failed at 1402.
Hunk #10 failed at 1429.
Hunk #11 failed at 1736.
Hunk #12 failed at 1762.
Hunk #13 failed at 1792.
Hunk #14 failed at 1813.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 1830.
Hunk #16 failed at 1903.
Hunk #17 failed at 2002.
Hunk #18 failed at 2090.
Hunk #19 failed at 2165.
Hunk #20 failed at 2250.
Hunk #21 failed at 2340.
Hunk #22 failed at 2375.
Hunk #23 failed at 2460.
Hunk #24 failed at 2520.
Hunk #25 failed at 2554.
Hunk #26 failed at 2608.
Hunk #27 failed at 2644.
Hunk #28 failed at 2676.
Hunk #29 failed at 2894.
Hunk #30 failed at 2920.
Hunk #31 succeeded at 3251 with fuzz 1.
Hunk #32 failed at 3308.
Hunk #33 failed at 3422.
Hunk #34 failed at 3441.
Hunk #35 failed at 3456.
Hunk #36 failed at 3476.
Hunk #37 failed at 3491.
Hunk #38 failed at 3528.
Hunk #39 failed at 3546.
Hunk #40 failed at 3574.
Hunk #41 failed at 3602.
Hunk #42 failed at 3630.
Hunk #43 failed at 3658.
Hunk #44 failed at 3686.
Hunk #45 failed at 4121.
Hunk #46 failed at 4208.
Hunk #47 failed at 4229.
Hunk #48 failed at 4257.
Hunk #49 failed at 4278.
Hunk #50 failed at 4295.
Hunk #51 failed at 4551.
Hunk #52 failed at 4579.
Hunk #53 failed at 4714.
Hunk #54 failed at 4862.
Hunk #55 failed at 4899.
Hunk #56 failed at 4932.
Hunk #57 failed at 4972.
Hunk #58 failed at 5125.
Hunk #59 failed at 5150.
Hunk #60 failed at 5225.
Hunk #61 failed at 5282.
Hunk #62 failed at 5336.
Hunk #63 failed at 5398.
Hunk #64 failed at 5851.
Hunk #65 failed at 5870.
Hunk #66 failed at 5949.
Hunk #67 failed at 6009.
Hunk #68 failed at 6059.
Hunk #69 failed at 6138.
Hunk #70 failed at 6161.
Hunk #71 failed at 6180.
Hunk #72 succeeded at 6924 with fuzz 1.
68 out of 72 hunks failed--saving rejects to libhtmlw/HTMLformat.c.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libhtmlw/HTMLparse.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:43 1994
|+++ libhtmlw/HTMLparse.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:00 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libhtmlw/HTMLparse.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 76 with fuzz 1.
Hunk #2 failed at 200.
Hunk #3 failed at 214.
Hunk #4 failed at 226.
Hunk #5 failed at 241.
Hunk #6 failed at 261.
Hunk #7 failed at 273.
Hunk #8 failed at 321.
Hunk #9 failed at 409.
Hunk #10 failed at 438.
Hunk #11 failed at 454.
Hunk #12 failed at 525.
Hunk #13 failed at 570.
Hunk #14 failed at 756.
Hunk #15 failed at 1047.
Hunk #16 failed at 1276.
Hunk #17 failed at 1289.
Hunk #18 failed at 1310.
Hunk #19 failed at 1363.
18 out of 19 hunks failed--saving rejects to libhtmlw/HTMLparse.c.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libhtmlw/HTMLwidgets.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:43 1994
|+++ libhtmlw/HTMLwidgets.c Wed Apr 13 06:39:26 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libhtmlw/HTMLwidgets.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 110.
Hunk #2 failed at 422.
Hunk #3 failed at 464.
Hunk #4 failed at 1300.
Hunk #5 failed at 2206.
Hunk #6 failed at 2268.
Hunk #7 failed at 2300.
Hunk #8 failed at 2342.
Hunk #9 failed at 2379.
Hunk #10 failed at 2442.
Hunk #11 failed at 2605.
Hunk #12 failed at 2618.
Hunk #13 failed at 2685.
Hunk #14 failed at 2736.
Hunk #15 failed at 2763.
Hunk #16 failed at 2809.
Hunk #17 failed at 2889.
Hunk #18 failed at 2971.
Hunk #19 failed at 2996.
Hunk #20 failed at 3092.
Hunk #21 failed at 3109.
Hunk #22 failed at 3136.
Hunk #23 succeeded at 4161.
21 out of 23 hunks failed--saving rejects to libhtmlw/HTMLwidgets.c.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libwww2/HTNews.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:28 1994
|+++ libwww2/HTNews.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:02 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libwww2/HTNews.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 427.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to libwww2/HTNews.c.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- libwww2/HTTP.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:30 1994
|+++ libwww2/HTTP.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:02 1994
--------------------------
Patching file libwww2/HTTP.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 32.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 204.
1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to libwww2/HTTP.c.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/annotate.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:00 1994
|+++ src/annotate.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:02 1994
--------------------------
Patching file src/annotate.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 637.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 712.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/gui-dialogs.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:01 1994
|+++ src/gui-dialogs.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:02 1994
--------------------------
Patching file src/gui-dialogs.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1007.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1166.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1231.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/gui-documents.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:02 1994
|+++ src/gui-documents.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:03 1994
--------------------------
Patching file src/gui-documents.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 249.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 401.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 522.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 753.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 940.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1030.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/gui-menubar.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:01 1994
|+++ src/gui-menubar.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:04 1994
--------------------------
Patching file src/gui-menubar.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 67.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 228.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 271.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 310.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 349.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 388.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 427.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 466.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 505.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 544.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 583.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 622.
Hunk #13 succeeded at 661.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 700.
Hunk #15 succeeded at 1186.
Hunk #16 succeeded at 1694.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 2024.
Hunk #18 succeeded at 2063.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 2090.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/gui.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:59 1994
|+++ src/gui.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:05 1994
--------------------------
Patching file src/gui.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1194.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1483.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1556.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1567.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1647.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 2072.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 2311.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 2473.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/history.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:58 1994
|+++ src/history.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:05 1994
--------------------------
Patching file src/history.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 401.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 735.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/hotlist.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:58 1994
|+++ src/hotlist.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:05 1994
--------------------------
Patching file src/hotlist.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 339.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 997.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/main.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:59 1994
|+++ src/main.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:06 1994
--------------------------
Patching file src/main.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 61.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 78.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 201.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/mo-www.c.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:00 1994
|+++ src/mo-www.c Wed Apr 13 05:20:06 1994
--------------------------
Patching file src/mo-www.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 850.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 861.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/mosaic.h.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:01 1994
|+++ src/mosaic.h Wed Apr 13 05:20:06 1994
--------------------------
Patching file src/mosaic.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 81.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 253.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 289.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 381.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 403.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 577.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 632.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 748.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- src/xresources.h.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:06 1994
|+++ src/xresources.h Wed Apr 13 05:20:07 1994
--------------------------
Patching file src/xresources.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 288.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 385.
Hunk #3 failed at 417.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 547.
Hunk #5 failed at 805.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 883.
2 out of 6 hunks failed--saving rejects to src/xresources.h.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- Makefile.alpha.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:45 1994
|+++ Makefile.alpha Wed Apr 13 05:20:07 1994
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile.alpha using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 8.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 19.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 38.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 55.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 72.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 93.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 175.
Hunk #8 failed at 203.
1 out of 8 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.alpha.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- Makefile.dec.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:06 1994
|+++ Makefile.dec Wed Apr 13 05:20:07 1994
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile.dec using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 8.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 19.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 38.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 55.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 70.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 90.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 177.
Hunk #8 failed at 205.
1 out of 8 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.dec.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- Makefile.hiux.orig Wed Apr 13 07:27:52 1994
|+++ Makefile.hiux Wed Apr 13 07:29:48 1994
--------------------------
(Creating file Makefile.hiux...)
Patching file Makefile.hiux using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- Makefile.hp.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:35 1994
|+++ Makefile.hp Wed Apr 13 05:20:07 1994
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile.hp using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 173.
Hunk #2 failed at 199.
1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.hp.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- Makefile.ibm.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:06 1994
|+++ Makefile.ibm Wed Apr 13 05:20:08 1994
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile.ibm using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 173.
Hunk #2 failed at 199.
1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.ibm.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- Makefile.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:07 1994
|+++ Makefile Wed Apr 13 05:20:08 1994
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 57.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 95.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 180.
Hunk #4 failed at 234.
1 out of 4 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- Makefile.solaris.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:07 1994
|+++ Makefile.solaris Wed Apr 13 05:20:08 1994
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile.solaris using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 173.
Hunk #2 failed at 199.
1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.solaris.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- Makefile.sony.orig Wed Apr 13 07:27:57 1994
|+++ Makefile.sony Wed Apr 13 07:50:37 1994
--------------------------
(Creating file Makefile.sony...)
Patching file Makefile.sony using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- Makefile.sun.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:07 1994
|+++ Makefile.sun Wed Apr 13 05:20:08 1994
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile.sun using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 68.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 175.
Hunk #3 failed at 201.
1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.sun.rej
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- app-defaults.color-sgi.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:35 1994
|+++ app-defaults.color-sgi Wed Apr 13 05:20:08 1994
--------------------------
Patching file app-defaults.color-sgi using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 112.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- app-defaults.color.orig Mon Apr 11 11:57:35 1994
|+++ app-defaults.color Wed Apr 13 05:20:09 1994
--------------------------
Patching file app-defaults.color using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 115 with fuzz 1.
Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- app-defaults.mono.orig Mon Apr 11 11:58:07 1994
|+++ app-defaults.mono Wed Apr 13 05:20:09 1994
--------------------------
Patching file app-defaults.mono using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 95.
done
----- End Included Message -----